Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
Attorney RJ Dieken, Loki Esq Law, Montana

Neueste Episode
579 Episoden
NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE, ET AL. v. SHERROD BROWN, ET AL. (Ripeness, Admin Law, Media Discounts for people running for public office).
05.09.2026 | 8 Min.Send us Fan Mail
The Court did not seem to think the 4th Circuit should have made a ruling on an appeal from the 4th Circuit, therefore they grant a stay of the 4th's Stay.
Support the showNATIONAL PARK SERVICE, ET AL. v. NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES (WHITE HOUSE CONSTRUCTION, ARTICLE III STANDING)
01.09.2026 | 17 Min.Send us Fan Mail
The Supreme Court Thinks the National Trust for Historic Preservation in The United States Does not have Article III Standing. (Simplified)
Construction on the White House East Wing can resume (Simplified)
Support the show- Send us Fan Mail
1. Title IX allows schools to provide separate women’s and men’s sports teams defined by biological sex, and West Virginia has permissibly maintained female sports for biological females consistent with Title IX.
Support the show National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) (Campaign Finance/Election Law)
01.07.2026 | 7 Min.Send us Fan Mail
In NRSC v. FEC the Supreme Court granted Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit to answer the question of whether the limits imposed by the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) on how much political parties can spend in direct coordination with their federal candidates violate the First Amendment.
Held: FECA’s political party coordinated expenditure limits violate the First Amendment. Justice Kavanaugh delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C.J., and Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, and Barrett, JJ., joined. Kagan, J. Filed a dissenting opinion in which Sotomayor and Jackson, JJ., joined.
Read by Jake A. Leahy.
Support the show
Weitere Bildung Podcasts
Trending Bildung Podcasts
Über Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
Following what the Supreme Court is actually doing can be daunting. Reporting on the subject is often only done within the context of political narratives of the day -- and following the Court's decisions and reading every new case can be a non-starter. The purpose of this Podcast is to make it as easy as possible for members of the public to source information about what is happening at the Supreme Court. For that reason, we read every Opinion Syllabus without any commentary whatsoever. Further, there are no advertisements or sponsors. We call it "information sourcing," and we hope that the podcast is a useful resource for members of the public who want to understand the legal issues of the day, prospective law students who want to get to know legal language and understand good legal writing, and attorneys who can use the podcast to be better advocates for their clients. *Note this podcast is for informational and educational purposes only.
Podcast-WebsiteHöre Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast), Wissen mit Zoé und viele andere Podcasts aus aller Welt mit der radio.de-App

Hol dir die kostenlose radio.de App
- Sender und Podcasts favorisieren
- Streamen via Wifi oder Bluetooth
- Unterstützt Carplay & Android Auto
- viele weitere App Funktionen
Hol dir die kostenlose radio.de App
- Sender und Podcasts favorisieren
- Streamen via Wifi oder Bluetooth
- Unterstützt Carplay & Android Auto
- viele weitere App Funktionen


Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
Code scannen,
App laden,
loshören.
App laden,
loshören.






























