The People’s Court Podcast

First, the plaintiff was walking her dog when the defendant's dog bit her. The plaintiff is suing for medical costs. The defendant says there is no way his dog attacked the plaintiff's.

Then, the plaintiff did some mechanical work on the defendant's car, but she hasn't paid, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant says the plaintiff is a scammer.

Plus, the plaintiff was going to purchase a townhouse, and she spent money on an inspection. However, the defendant backed out of the deal, so the plaintiff is suing for the money she already spent. The defendant admits she backed out of the deal, but there was no contract in place, and nothing was signed yet.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff put her car in the defendant's name. However, the vehicle was impounded, and she can't get it out, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant claims the plaintiff was supposed to pay half the expenses but fell behind. The defendant is countersuing for unpaid parking tickets, insurance costs, and pain and suffering.

Then, the plaintiff says the defendants, his former tenants, caused damage and moved out without proper notice, so the plaintiff is suing for back rent and fees. The defendants argue there were issues with the apartment since day one. The defendants discovered multiple code violations with the place, and they believe they owe nothing.

Plus, the plaintiff claims the defendant's son stole his son's scooter, so he's suing. The defendant insists her son had nothing to do with the scooter.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff says the defendant's dogs kept doing their business on his driveway. The plaintiff had to hire professionals to clean up the mess, so he's suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff complains about everything, and his dogs are great. The defendant has no idea what the plaintiff is talking about with this lawsuit.

Then, the plaintiff loaned the defendant money, and in exchange, she was going to use the defendant's car for a month. However, the defendant backed out of the deal, so the plaintiff is suing for her money back. The defendant claims she drove the plaintiff all over town for appointments, and the plaintiff gave her some gas money. The defendant doesn't understand why the plaintiff wants her money back.

Plus, the plaintiff says the defendant, her upstairs neighbor, flooded the toilet. The ceiling collapsed and damaged belongings as a result, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant says she didn't cause the flooding.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff brought his car into the defendant's shop, but he trashed the bumper and caused other issues, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues he repaired the vehicle for free. The plaintiff didn't complain until two years later.

Then, the plaintiff claims the defendant, her ex, took her computer and video camera and threw them out. The plaintiff is suing for the value of her belongings. The defendant says the plaintiff up and moved out on him one day. The defendant insists the plaintiff abandoned the items, so he had every right to throw them out.

Plus, the plaintiff worked for the defendant's car service. However, things didn't work out. The plaintiff wants his security deposit he gave the defendant for the car he drove, as well as unpaid wages, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff only worked nine jobs for him and abruptly changed his mind about the position.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff says the defendant knocked over a motorcycle, and it fell on the hood of her car. The plaintiff is suing for damages. The defendant argues she didn't knock over the motorcycle, so she is not responsible for the damages.

Then, the plaintiff used to be really close to the defendant. However, the plaintiff claims she sold the defendant a television, but he hasn't paid in full, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant admits he owes some money, but he lost his job.

Plus, the plaintiff, a handwriting expert who certifies signatures, claims the defendant hired him during his divorce. However, the plaintiff says the defendant hasn't yet paid him, so he's suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff was supposed to testify in court for the case but didn't.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices